SYSTEM SECURITY PLAN TEMPLATE

System Boundary · Authorization Context · Control Implementation · Inheritance · Evidence Index


Document ID CERG-TMPL-CUI-001
Version 1.0
Status Approved
Classification Public
Owner CMMC / Federal Compliance Manager
Parent Plan CERG-PLN-CUI-001 - CUI / CMMC Operational Package
Supporting Documents CERG-GOV-CB-001 · CERG-STD-CUI-001 · CERG-STD-AM-001 · CERG-PRC-RM-001 · CERG-TMPL-CUI-002
Review Cycle Annual / On system boundary, CUI scope, or authorization change
Frameworks NIST 800-171r3 · NIST 800-172 · CMMC L2 · NIST 800-53r5
Regulations Controlled Unclassified Information / CMMC contractual obligations
Environments Systems that store, process, transmit, or protect CUI

Table of Contents

  1. Purpose and Use
  2. Template Instructions
  3. SSP Cover Page
  4. System Boundary
  5. System Environment
  6. CUI Data Flow
  7. Roles and Responsibilities
  8. Control Implementation Matrix
  9. Inherited Controls
  10. External Providers and Interconnections
  11. Open Items and POA&M Linkage
  12. Evidence Index
  13. Approval and Maintenance
  14. Document Control

1. Purpose and Use

This template creates a System Security Plan (SSP) for a system that stores, processes, transmits, or protects Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). It is designed to be copied into a system-specific artifact and completed by the system owner, technical owners, and CMMC / Federal Compliance Manager.

The SSP explains the system boundary, CUI data flow, implemented security controls, inherited controls, external dependencies, open gaps, and evidence locations. It supports CMMC readiness, federal customer assurance, and internal authorization decisions.

An SSP Is a Control Story, Not a Form Dump

A useful SSP tells a reviewer what the system is, where CUI moves, which controls protect it, which controls are inherited, where the evidence lives, and what remains unfinished. If a control answer cannot be tied to evidence or a POA&M item, the SSP is not ready.


2. Template Instructions

  1. Copy this template and rename the copy for the specific system.
  2. Replace bracketed fields such as [System Name] with system-specific content.
  3. Do not delete sections that are not applicable. Mark them Not Applicable and explain why.
  4. Use asset IDs from CERG-STD-AM-001 wherever possible.
  5. Link all open control gaps to CERG-TMPL-CUI-002 POA&M entries.
  6. Link material residual risks to CERG-PRC-RM-001 risk-register entries.
  7. Store evidence in the evidence library governed by CERG-PRC-AUD-001.
  8. Review the completed SSP annually and when the system boundary changes.

3. SSP Cover Page

Field Value
System Name [System Name]
System Acronym [Acronym]
System Owner [Executive Sponsor or Business Owner]
Technical Owner [Engineering Pillar Leader or delegated technical owner]
CUI Scope [In Scope / Out of Scope / Partial]
Authorization Status [Draft / Under Review / Authorized / Not Authorized]
Environment [Production / Non-production / Hybrid]
Hosting Model [On-premises / Cloud / SaaS / Hybrid]
Highest Data Classification [Public / Internal / Confidential / Restricted / CUI]
External Providers [Provider names or None]
SSP Version [Version]
SSP Date [Date]

4. System Boundary

4.1 Boundary Narrative

Describe the system boundary in plain language.

[Insert system boundary narrative. Include major components, users, locations, cloud accounts, network zones, and excluded components.]

4.2 Boundary Components

Component / Asset ID Type Owner Location CUI Role Notes
[Asset ID] [Application / Server / Database / SaaS / Network / Endpoint] [Owner] [Location] [Stores / Processes / Transmits / Protects] [Notes]

4.3 Boundary Exclusions

Excluded Component Reason Excluded Evidence / Rationale
[Component] [Reason] [Evidence location]

5. System Environment

Area Description
Users [User populations and access paths]
Administrators [Privileged user groups]
Identity Provider [IdP, MFA, federation, PAM]
Network Zones [Network segments and trust boundaries]
Endpoints [Managed endpoints, VDI, mobile, BYOD constraints]
Logging [Log sources and retention]
Backup and Recovery [Backup tier, RTO, RPO, restore evidence]
Encryption [Data-at-rest and data-in-transit controls]
Exposure Management [Scanner, cadence, SLA]
Configuration Baseline [Baseline source and exception handling]

6. CUI Data Flow

6.1 Data Categories

CUI Category Source Storage Location Transmission Path Recipient Protection Notes
[Category] [Source] [System / database / repository] [Path] [Recipient] [Controls]

6.2 Data Flow Narrative

[Describe how CUI enters, moves through, exits, and is retained or deleted from the system.]

6.3 Data Flow Diagram Reference

Diagram Name Location Last Updated
[Diagram] [Repository / evidence location] [Date]

7. Roles and Responsibilities

Use canonical CERG roles from CERG-GOV-OM-001.

Role SSP Responsibility Named Person / Team
CMMC / Federal Compliance Manager Owns SSP governance, review cycle, and CMMC mapping. [Name]
Engineering Pillar Leader Owns technical implementation accuracy. [Name]
Governance Pillar Leader Owns evidence and policy alignment. [Name]
Risk Pillar Leader Owns residual-risk linkage. [Name]
Evidence Librarian Maintains SSP evidence index. [Name]
Risk Register Owner Tracks risk and exception entries. [Name]

8. Control Implementation Matrix

Create one row per applicable requirement or control.

Control ID Control Title Status Implementation Statement Owner Evidence POA&M / Risk Link
[800-171 / CMMC / CERG ID] [Title] [Implemented / Partially Implemented / Planned / Inherited / Not Applicable] [How the system satisfies the control] [Canonical role] [Evidence location] [POA&M ID / Risk ID / None]

Implementation statements must be specific enough that an assessor can understand what exists without interviewing the whole team.


9. Inherited Controls

Inherited Control Inherited From Inheritance Condition Evidence Owner Evidence Location
[Control ID] [Enterprise / Cloud Provider / SaaS / Shared Platform] [Condition for inheritance] [Owner] [Location]

Inherited controls are valid only when the system still satisfies the conditions required to inherit them.


10. External Providers and Interconnections

Provider / Connection Purpose Data Shared Security Requirements Evidence
[Provider or connection] [Purpose] [Data] [Requirements] [Evidence]

Vendor and interconnection risks are linked to CERG-PRC-TPRM-001 and CERG-PRC-RM-001.


11. Open Items and POA&M Linkage

POA&M ID Related Control Gap Summary Owner Target Date Current Status
[POA&M ID] [Control ID] [Gap] [Owner] [Date] [Status]

No known control gap may remain only in narrative text. Every gap must have a POA&M item, risk-register entry, or documented not-applicable rationale.


12. Evidence Index

Evidence ID Evidence Name Control(s) Location Owner Refresh Cadence
[EV-001] [Evidence name] [Control IDs] [Location] [Owner] [Cadence]

13. Approval and Maintenance

Approval Role Approval Meaning Name / Date
CMMC / Federal Compliance Manager SSP is complete enough for CMMC / CUI governance. [Name / Date]
Engineering Pillar Leader Technical statements are accurate. [Name / Date]
Risk Pillar Leader Open risks and POA&M items are correctly recorded. [Name / Date]
Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) Authorization or acceptance decision is recorded. [Name / Date]

14. Document Control

Field Value
Document ID CERG-TMPL-CUI-001
Version 1.0
Status Approved
Effective Date 2026-05-22
Classification Public
Owner CMMC / Federal Compliance Manager
Approved By CISO
Parent Plan CERG-PLN-CUI-001 - CUI / CMMC Operational Package
Review Cycle Annual; and on system boundary, CUI scope, or authorization change
Next Scheduled Review 2027-05-22
Frameworks NIST 800-171r3; NIST 800-172; CMMC L2; NIST 800-53r5
Regulations Controlled Unclassified Information / CMMC contractual obligations
Environments Systems that store, process, transmit, or protect CUI

Revision History

Version Date Author Change Summary
1.0 Draft 2026-05-22 Cyber Governance Initial release. Establishes a fill-in System Security Plan template for system boundary, CUI data flow, control implementation, inherited controls, external providers, POA&M linkage, evidence index, and approval workflow.

Review Triggers

  • System boundary change
  • CUI data-flow change
  • Authorization or assessment event
  • Material control implementation change
  • POA&M or residual-risk change requiring SSP update
  • Direction from the CISO

Source: templates/CERG-TMPL-CUI-001_System_Security_Plan_Template.md · Download .md · View on GitHub