Document ID CERG-GOV-JD-SECENG-006
Version 1.0
Status Approved
Classification Public
Owner Engineering Pillar Leader
Parent Policy CERG-POL-001 - Cybersecurity Policy
Review Cycle Annual
Frameworks NIST SP 800-181r1 (NICE)
Regulations Cross-cutting
Environments All CERG-managed workforce

Cryptography Engineer

Job Family: JF-SECENG — Security Engineering Job Level Range: L1-L4 (CERG Grade S1-S4) CERG Canonical Role: Cryptography Engineer (CERG-GOV-OM-001 §6.1)


1. Role Summary

The Cryptography Engineer owns cryptography and key management: the key management platforms, the certificate authority hierarchy, the transport security posture, and FIPS compliance. They ensure that encryption is correctly implemented, keys are protected, certificates do not expire unexpectedly, and cryptographic standards are met across the estate.

2. NICE Workforce Framework Mapping

Mapping Level NICE Work Role NICE Work Role ID NICE Work Role Category
Primary Security Architect SP-ARC-001 SP

NICE Work Role Definition: See JF-002 for the official NICE Work Role definition and complete CERG-to-NICE mapping. The NICE TKS database is available at https://www.nist.gov/nice/framework/.

3. Job Family & Level Placement

Family JF-SECENG — Security Engineering
Level Range L1 through L4
CERG Grade Range S1-S4
Terminal Grade S4 — see JA-001 §7 for details
Track SME

4. Key Responsibilities

4.1 Core Responsibilities (All Grades)

  • Design, implement, and maintain the enterprise key management infrastructure (HSM, cloud KMS, secrets vaults) - Govern the certificate authority (CA) hierarchy: internal CA, public CA integrations, certificate lifecycle automation - Define and enforce transport security requirements: TLS versions, cipher suites, certificate validation - Manage secrets rotation for machine identities, API keys, and service accounts - Ensure FIPS 140-2/140-3 compliance for cryptographic modules in regulated environments - Conduct cryptographic assessments of new systems, applications, and vendor products - Support the rotation of exposed secrets during incident response - Contribute to the Cryptography and Key Management Standard and maintain its technical requirements - Advise Engineering and IT teams on cryptographic design decisions

4.2 Grade-Level Responsibility Differentiation

Grade-level responsibility differentiation for this role is defined in JA-001 §7 (Role-to-Grade Mapping). The grade definitions (S1-S4 SME Track, M1-M4 Management Track) and leveling dimensions are in CERG-GOV-JA-001 §4-5. Behavioral anchors at each grade are in CMP-001.

5. Required Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSAs)

5.1 Domain Expertise

  • Deep expertise in cryptographic principles: symmetric and asymmetric encryption, hashing, digital signatures, key agreement protocols - PKI architecture and certificate lifecycle management - Key management platforms: HashiCorp Vault, cloud-native KMS, Thales/CipherTrust, Utimaco - Hardware security modules (HSMs) - TLS/PKI tools and protocols: ACME, OCSP, CRL, S/MIME, code signing - FIPS 140-2/140-3 and Common Criteria standards - Post-quantum cryptography awareness (preparing for transition, not yet implementing)

5.2 Technical Skills

Technical skills for this role are documented in the original JD-001 content extracted into this file (see §5.1 Domain Expertise). Additional technical skill definitions aligned to NICE Skill Statements are maintained in JF-002.

5.3 CERG-Specific Knowledge

CERG-specific knowledge requirements for this role are defined in OM-001 §6 (Canonical Role Roster) and RAC-001 §7 (Role Descriptions). See §12 (Related CERG Documents) for the complete list of standards and procedures relevant to this role.

6. NICE TKS Statement References

The following Task, Knowledge, and Skill statements are extracted from the NIST NICE Framework v2.2.0 Work Role [DD-WRL-001 — Cryptography Engineer primary mapping] and filtered by relevance to this CERG role. The full TKS database is maintained at https://www.nist.gov/nice/framework/.

NICE TKS Type Statement ID Statement Summary Relevance to This Role
Task T0084 Employ secure configuration management processes Core work activity for this NICE Work Role
Task T0542 Translate proposed capabilities into technical requirements Core work activity for this NICE Work Role
Task T1010 Communicate enterprise information technology architecture Core work activity for this NICE Work Role
Task T1019 Determine special needs of cyber-physical systems Core work activity for this NICE Work Role
Task T1020 Determine the operational and safety impacts of cybersecurity lapses Core work activity for this NICE Work Role
Knowledge K0698 Knowledge of cryptographic key management principles and practices Foundational knowledge for this role
Knowledge K0876 Knowledge of key management service (KMS) key rotation policies and procedures Foundational knowledge for this role
Knowledge K0694 Knowledge of computer algorithm capabilities and applications Foundational knowledge for this role
Knowledge K0859 Knowledge of encryption tools and techniques Foundational knowledge for this role
Knowledge K0874 Knowledge of key management service (KMS) principles and practices Foundational knowledge for this role
Skill S0657 Skill in implementing Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) encryption Core capability for this role
Skill S0658 Skill in implementing digital signatures Core capability for this role
Skill S0141 Skill in assessing security systems designs Core capability for this role
Skill S0172 Skill in applying secure coding techniques Core capability for this role
Skill S0383 Skill in analyzing an organization’s enterprise information technology architecture Core capability for this role

Full TKS Reference: The complete TKS statement set for the primary NICE Work Role (SP-ARC-001 → DD-WRL-001) is in the NICE Framework Components v2.2.0 dataset (download). JF-002 contains the complete CERG-to-NICE crosswalk with secondary role mappings.

7. Typical Qualifications

7.1 Education

  • 5-15+ years in cybersecurity, with 3+ years focused on cryptography or PKI - Bachelor’s degree in computer science, mathematics, or a related field - Relevant certifications: CISSP, CISM, vendor-specific HSM/KMS certifications, or equivalent

7.2 Certifications

Certifications for this role are defined in TRN-001 §3 (Certification Matrix). The matrix specifies Required, Recommended, and Aspirational certifications per role and grade.

7.3 Experience

Typical experience ranges by grade are defined in JA-001 §4-5. See §7.1 (Education) above for education requirements.

8. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

KPIs for this role are defined in MTR-001 (Metrics, Dashboard, and CISO/Board Reporting). KPI allocation by job family and grade-level thresholds are documented in PERF-001. Each role’s evaluation criteria are embedded in the per-role JD document structure defined by JF-001.

9. Competency Expectations by Grade

Competency expectations for this role follow the Engineering pillar behavioral anchors from CERG-GOV-CMP-001. Each cell describes observable behavior demonstrating the competency at that grade. Anchors are cumulative: an L3 expectation includes the L1 and L2 anchors.

Competency Domain (CMP-001) L1 Expectation L2 Expectation L3 Expectation L4 Expectation
Technical Depth Executes assigned engineering tasks (IaC module, configuration change, architecture review checklist item) from established procedures. Recognizes when a task result does not match expected output and escalates with context. Learning the organization’s technology stack: can name the major platforms, their purpose, and their security control points. Owns a technology domain (e.g., AWS security, Azure AD, Kubernetes admission control). Designs and implements security controls independently within that domain. Performs architecture reviews in their domain and produces findings that require minimal rework from the reviewer. Authors and improves procedures for their domain. Shapes the organization’s technical security strategy in their domain. Designs reference architectures adopted by other engineers. Anticipates how changes in the technology stack will affect security posture before they land. Performs architecture reviews across domains with credibility. Sets the technical bar for the entire Engineering pillar. Called upon for the hardest cross-domain problems. Represents the organization’s engineering position to vendors, industry working groups, and regulators. Can step into any Engineering domain and contribute meaningfully within days.
Cross-Pillar Fluency Understands that Risk and Governance pillars exist and can describe their basic functions. Reads vulnerability reports and compliance findings that affect their work. Consumes Risk pillar output (vulnerability data, threat intelligence) and incorporates it into engineering decisions. Understands what Governance needs from Engineering for an audit and provides it without being chased. Anticipates what Risk and Governance will need from an engineering decision before they ask. Participates in cross-pillar working groups as the Engineering voice. Can represent Engineering’s position to a regulator or auditor without a Governance handler. Operates fluently across all three pillars. Contributes to Risk assessments and Governance standards as a peer, not a guest. Is the person a pillar leader calls when a cross-pillar problem does not fit any procedure.
Risk Judgment Follows the risk taxonomy when documenting findings. Can distinguish between a configuration drift alert that needs a ticket and one that needs an incident response page. Independently assesses the severity and likelihood of findings in their domain. Assigns risk ratings that are consistent with the taxonomy and rarely adjusted by a senior reviewer. Evaluates risk across domains and articulates the business impact in terms an executive can act on. Identifies compensating controls that reduce risk below what a pure vulnerability score would suggest. Shapes the organization’s risk appetite through technical judgment. Called upon by the CISO for independent risk assessments on material decisions. Their risk evaluation carries the same weight as a pillar leader’s.
Communication Writes clear ticket updates and status reports. Explains a technical finding to their immediate team without ambiguity. Writes architecture review findings that a project manager or business owner can understand and act on. Presents technical topics to their pillar. Authors clear, usable procedures. Represents Engineering in cross-functional forums with credibility. Writes decision memos that frame technical options in business terms. Presents to senior leadership and external stakeholders. Communicates complex technical risk to the CISO, the board (as requested), regulators, and industry peers. Writes the organization’s public technical positions. Represents the organization at conferences and in industry working groups.
Operational Discipline Follows procedures correctly. Updates tickets and documentation when work is complete. Meets assigned SLAs. Admits when they do not know something rather than guessing. Owns operational SLAs for their domain work streams. Ensures evidence is collected and stored per the evidence procedure. Improves procedures when they find gaps. Their work is consistently auditable without retroactive cleanup. Designs procedures that are operationally sustainable, not just technically correct. Ensures the evidence trail for their domain is audit-ready at all times. Identifies and eliminates toil: automates repetitive operational tasks. Sets operational standards for the pillar. Defines what “good” looks like for procedure compliance, evidence quality, and SLA management. Holds the pillar accountable to its own operational commitments.
Influence and Mentorship Actively learns from senior engineers. Asks good questions. Shares what they learn with peers. Onboards new Specialists without assistance. Peer-reviews code and configurations with constructive feedback. Their technical opinion is sought by other engineers in their domain. Mentors Specialists and Sr. Specialists across domains. Leads technical initiatives without formal authority. Their architectural recommendations are rarely overruled. Shapes the development of the entire Engineering team. Sets the technical bar through their own work and their mentoring. Influences hiring profiles, team composition, and organizational design.
Compliance and Regulatory Literacy Knows which regulatory frameworks apply to their organization. Can describe the security implications of the major ones (NERC-CIP, CMMC, SOX) at a high level. Understands the specific regulatory requirements that affect their domain. Can explain to an auditor how a control they implemented satisfies a regulatory requirement. Anticipates regulatory implications of engineering decisions. Advises project teams on compliance requirements before design is complete. Represents Engineering in regulatory audits without a Governance chaperone. Contributes to the organization’s regulatory strategy. Engages with regulators on technical matters. Shapes standards so that compliance is a byproduct of good engineering, not a separate activity.
Continuous Learning Completes assigned training. Pursues foundational certifications relevant to their domain. Learns the organization’s technology stack. Maintains current certifications. Stays current on developments in their domain. Shares what they learn with the team. Pursues advanced certifications. Contributes to the team’s knowledge base through documented research, brown-bag sessions, or internal training. Evaluates new technologies for organizational adoption. Recognized externally for expertise. Shapes the organization’s technology and certification roadmap. The person other engineers go to when they need to understand an emerging technology or threat.

Full Reference: See CERG-GOV-CMP-001 for the complete competency model, including the Management Track addendum (§7) and guidance on using the model for hiring, development, and promotion (§8).

10. Success Profile

A Cryptography Engineer is successful when the organization’s cryptographic posture is correct by design and sustainable over time. Key indicators: all cryptographic keys are managed through a centralized key management system with full lifecycle tracking; certificate expiry is never an emergency; TLS configurations across the estate score A+ on every assessment; cryptographic algorithms and key lengths are consistent with current best practice. The engineer makes crypto “boring” — it works correctly, automatically, and nobody has to think about it.

11. Career Path

11.1 Within-Family Progression

Within JF-SECENG, progression follows the Security Engineering level ladder in JF-001 §9.1: L1 Associate Engineer/S1, L2 Engineer/S2, L3 Senior or Staff Engineer/S3, and L4 Principal Engineer/S4. Promotion evidence should show increasing autonomy in secure design and implementation, ownership of engineering work streams, authorship or improvement of standards and reference architectures, cross-pillar influence, and mentoring of less experienced engineers. The grade definitions and progression dimensions are maintained in JA-001 §4.


11.2 Cross-Family Movement

Cross-family movement options are defined in the Family-to-Family Career Lattice (JF-001 §4). The Left-Right Knowledge Model (FRM-001 §9.2) and cross-training expectations (OM-001 §10.4) operationalize cross-family career movement.

11.3 Management Track Option

At L3+ (SME track), a Management track option may be available per CERG-GOV-JA-001 §8.1 (SME to Management Transition). Readiness indicators include: consistently sought out for guidance by junior team members, leading cross-functional initiatives without formal authority, and communicating clearly with non-technical stakeholders. The transition is a track change, not a grade promotion — an S3 Advisor moving to M1 Manager carries their technical credibility into the management role. Management competencies are defined in CERG-GOV-CMP-001 §7. See CERG-GOV-JA-001 §5 for Management grade definitions (M1-M4) and §9 (Span of Control and Team Design) for when to create a management role.

Document ID Relevance
Operating Model CERG-GOV-OM-001 Canonical role name; pillar structure
RACI Instrument CERG-GOV-RAC-001 This role’s accountability assignments
Job Architecture CERG-GOV-JA-001 Grade definitions; progression criteria
Competency Model CERG-GOV-CMP-001 Full behavioral anchors
Performance Framework CERG-GOV-PERF-001 Performance review cadence and calibration
Training Framework CERG-GOV-TRN-001 Certification matrix
Job Families Overview CERG-GOV-JF-001 Family structure and level definitions
NICE Crosswalk CERG-GOV-JF-002 NICE Work Role mapping

13. Document Control

Field Value
Document ID CERG-GOV-JD-SECENG-006
Version 1.0
Status Approved
Effective Date 2026-06-11
Classification Public
Owner Engineering Pillar Leader
Approved By CISO
Parent Policy CERG-POL-001 - Cybersecurity Policy
Review Cycle Annual
Next Scheduled Review 2027-06-11
Frameworks NIST SP 800-181r1 (NICE)
Regulations Cross-cutting
Environments All CERG-managed workforce

Revision History

Version Date Author Change Summary
1.0 2026-06-11 Governance Pillar Leader Initial release. Extracted from monolithic JD-001 into enhanced per-role format with NICE mapping, KPI sections, and competency anchor sections.

Review Triggers

  • Change to this role’s definition in CERG-GOV-OM-001 §6.1
  • Change to this role’s NICE Work Role mapping in JF-002
  • Change to this role’s grade range in CERG-GOV-JA-001 §7
  • Direction from the CISO

Governance owns this document. The Governance Pillar Leader (Policy & Standards) is responsible for initiating reviews, managing the revision cycle, and obtaining approval for all changes.

Document ID Relationship
Cybersecurity Policy CERG-POL-001 Parent policy
Job Families Overview CERG-GOV-JF-001 Family structure and level definitions
NICE Crosswalk CERG-GOV-JF-002 NICE Work Role mapping

Source: roles/jf-seceng/CERG-GOV-JD-SECENG-006_Cryptography_Engineer.md · Download .md · View on GitHub