Markdown GitHub


Document ID	CERG-GOV-JD-RISKOPS-006
Version	1.0
Status	Approved
Classification	Public
Owner	Risk Pillar Leader
Parent Policy	`CERG-POL-001` - Cybersecurity Policy
Review Cycle	Annual
Frameworks	NIST SP 800-181r1 (NICE)
Regulations	Cross-cutting
Environments	All CERG-managed workforce

Identity Risk Analyst

Job Family: JF-RISKOPS — Risk Operations Job Level Range: L1-L4 (CERG Grade S1-S4/M3) CERG Canonical Role: Identity Risk Analyst (CERG-GOV-OM-001 §6.1)

1. Role Summary

The Identity Risk Analyst owns identity-threat detection: user and entity behavior analytics, OAuth and token risk, and the detection of identity-based attacks. They focus on what happens after authentication: anomalous behavior, privilege escalation, lateral movement, and credential misuse that bypasses preventive controls.

2. NICE Workforce Framework Mapping

Mapping Level	NICE Work Role	NICE Work Role ID	NICE Work Role Category
Primary	Cyber Defense Analyst	PR-CDA-001	PR

NICE Work Role Definition: See JF-002 for the official NICE Work Role definition and complete CERG-to-NICE mapping. The NICE TKS database is available at https://www.nist.gov/nice/framework/.

3. Job Family & Level Placement

Family	JF-RISKOPS — Risk Operations
Level Range	L1 through L4
CERG Grade Range	S1-S4/M3
Terminal Grade	S4/M3 — see JA-001 §7 for details
Track	SME / Dual-track

4. Key Responsibilities

4.1 Core Responsibilities (All Grades)

Operate and tune user and entity behavior analytics (UEBA) platforms - Monitor for identity-based threats: compromised credentials, token theft, session hijacking, MFA fatigue, OAuth application abuse - Develop and maintain identity-risk detection rules and alerts - Investigate identity-related security events and escalate confirmed compromises to Incident Response - Assess OAuth and API token risk: excessive permissions, unused tokens, suspicious grant patterns - Monitor privileged account usage and detect anomalous privileged behavior - Partner with the Identity Engineer to ensure identity security controls are informed by observed attack patterns - Contribute identity-threat intelligence to the Threat Intelligence Analyst - Support incident response for identity-compromise scenarios

4.2 Grade-Level Responsibility Differentiation

Grade-level responsibility differentiation for this role is defined in JA-001 §7 (Role-to-Grade Mapping). The grade definitions (S1-S4 SME Track, M1-M4 Management Track) and leveling dimensions are in CERG-GOV-JA-001 §4-5. Behavioral anchors at each grade are in CMP-001.

5. Required Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSAs)

5.1 Domain Expertise

Identity platforms: Entra ID / Azure AD, Okta, Ping, Active Directory - UEBA platforms: Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics, Splunk UBA, Exabeam, or equivalent - Authentication protocols and their abuse: OAuth 2.0, SAML, Kerberos, NTLM - Identity attack techniques: Golden Ticket, Silver Ticket, Pass-the-Hash, Pass-the-Ticket, token replay, MFA fatigue - Cloud identity threats: Azure AD Connect compromise, cross-tenant attacks, B2B trust abuse - SIEM and log analysis for identity data sources

5.2 Technical Skills

Technical skills for this role are documented in the original JD-001 content extracted into this file (see §5.1 Domain Expertise). Additional technical skill definitions aligned to NICE Skill Statements are maintained in JF-002.

5.3 CERG-Specific Knowledge

CERG-specific knowledge requirements for this role are defined in OM-001 §6 (Canonical Role Roster) and RAC-001 §7 (Role Descriptions). See §12 (Related CERG Documents) for the complete list of standards and procedures relevant to this role.

6. NICE TKS Statement References

The following Task, Knowledge, and Skill statements are extracted from the NIST NICE Framework v2.2.0 Work Role [PD-WRL-001 — Identity Risk Analyst primary mapping] and filtered by relevance to this CERG role. The full TKS database is maintained at https://www.nist.gov/nice/framework/.

NICE TKS Type	Statement ID	Statement Summary	Relevance to This Role
Task	T1266	Recommend risk mitigation strategies	Core work activity for this NICE Work Role
Task	T1603	Recommend threat and vulnerability risk mitigation strategies	Core work activity for this NICE Work Role
Task	T1176	Determine if cybersecurity-enabled products reduce identified risk to acceptable levels	Core work activity for this NICE Work Role
Task	T1177	Determine if security control technologies reduce identified risk to acceptable levels	Core work activity for this NICE Work Role
Task	T1548	Determine adequacy of access controls	Core work activity for this NICE Work Role
Knowledge	K0742	Knowledge of identity and access management (IAM) principles and practices	Foundational knowledge for this role
Knowledge	K0747	Knowledge of Risk Adaptive (Adaptable) Access Controls (RAdAC)	Foundational knowledge for this role
Knowledge	K0675	Knowledge of risk management processes	Foundational knowledge for this role
Knowledge	K0685	Knowledge of access control principles and practices	Foundational knowledge for this role
Knowledge	K0716	Knowledge of host access control (HAC) systems and software	Foundational knowledge for this role
Skill	S0156	Skill in performing packet-level analysis	Core capability for this role
Skill	S0483	Skill in identifying software communications vulnerabilities	Core capability for this role
Skill	S0490	Skill in recreating network topologies	Core capability for this role
Skill	S0509	Skill in evaluating security products	Core capability for this role
Skill	S0543	Skill in scanning for vulnerabilities	Core capability for this role

Full TKS Reference: The complete TKS statement set for the primary NICE Work Role (PR-CDA-001 → PD-WRL-001) is in the NICE Framework Components v2.2.0 dataset (download). JF-002 contains the complete CERG-to-NICE crosswalk with secondary role mappings.

7. Typical Qualifications

7.1 Education

3-12+ years in cybersecurity, identity management, or security operations - Bachelor’s degree or equivalent experience - Relevant certifications: CIAM, CISSP, GCIH, GCIA, or equivalent

7.2 Certifications

Certifications for this role are defined in TRN-001 §3 (Certification Matrix). The matrix specifies Required, Recommended, and Aspirational certifications per role and grade.

7.3 Experience

Typical experience ranges by grade are defined in JA-001 §4-5. See §7.1 (Education) above for education requirements.

8. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

KPIs for this role are defined in MTR-001 (Metrics, Dashboard, and CISO/Board Reporting). KPI allocation by job family and grade-level thresholds are documented in PERF-001. Each role’s evaluation criteria are embedded in the per-role JD document structure defined by JF-001.

9. Competency Expectations by Grade

Competency expectations for this role follow the Risk pillar behavioral anchors from CERG-GOV-CMP-001. Each cell describes observable behavior demonstrating the competency at that grade. Anchors are cumulative: an L3 expectation includes the L1 and L2 anchors.

Competency Domain (CMP-001)	L1 Expectation	L2 Expectation	L3 Expectation	L4 Expectation
Technical Depth	Operates the Risk pillar’s tools (vulnerability scanner, CSPM platform, threat intel platform, detection pipeline) under supervision. Triages alerts following established procedures. Recognizes false positives and true positives with increasing accuracy.	Owns a Risk domain (e.g., exposure management for a platform class, vendor assessments for a business unit, a set of detection rules). Tunes tools to reduce noise and improve signal. Independently investigates findings and determines root cause.	Shapes the Risk pillar’s approach to exposure management. Designs assessment methodologies. Correlates findings across tools to identify systemic weaknesses that individual alerts miss.	Sets the analytical bar for the entire Risk pillar. Called upon for the hardest exposure questions. Represents the organization’s risk posture to regulators, auditors, and industry peers.
Cross-Pillar Fluency	Understands that Engineering builds systems and Governance owns compliance. Reads architecture review outputs and compliance standards that affect their risk assessments.	Delivers risk findings in a format Engineering can act on. Understands what evidence Governance needs from Risk assessments and provides it proactively. Participates in cross-pillar threat modeling sessions.	Collaborates with Engineering to design controls that address risk findings, not just report them. Feeds risk intelligence into Governance’s compliance calendar. Anticipates which risk findings will become audit findings.	Operates fluently across all three pillars. Contributes to Engineering architecture decisions and Governance standards as a peer. The person a pillar leader calls when a risk question spans all three pillars.
Risk Judgment	Applies the risk taxonomy correctly when triaging findings. Distinguishes between Critical, High, Medium, and Low severity using the defined criteria. Escalates findings that exceed SLA without delay.	Independently assesses the business impact of findings in their domain. Adjusts risk ratings based on context and documents the rationale. Produces risk assessments that the Risk Pillar Leader accepts without material revision.	Assesses systemic risk: identifies patterns across individual findings that indicate a deeper weakness. Evaluates risk from new technologies, vendors, or business initiatives before they are operational.	Shapes the organization’s risk appetite. Called upon by the CISO for independent risk evaluation on material decisions. Their risk judgment on novel or ambiguous situations is treated as authoritative.
Communication	Writes clear finding descriptions with reproducible steps, impact statements, and remediation guidance. Updates stakeholders on finding status without being prompted.	Delivers risk briefings to business owners and project teams. Translates vulnerability data into business risk without losing technical accuracy. Writes vendor risk assessment reports that procurement and legal can act on.	Presents risk posture to executive audiences. Communicates threat landscape changes and their organizational implications. Writes threat intelligence products consumed by leadership.	Communicates organizational risk posture to the board, regulators, and external stakeholders. Represents the organization’s risk position in industry forums.
Operational Discipline	Triages findings within SLA. Documents assessment results in the designated system. Follows the exposure management and risk register procedures.	Owns operational SLAs for their domain. Ensures risk register entries are current and complete. Maintains scanning schedules, detection rule lifecycles, or vendor assessment cadences without gaps.	Designs risk assessment workflows that produce consistent, auditable output. Ensures the Risk pillar’s operational cadence is documented, measured, and improving. Identifies and automates repetitive risk assessment tasks.	Sets operational standards for the Risk pillar. Defines what “defensible” risk assessment looks like under regulatory scrutiny.
Influence and Mentorship	Learns from senior analysts. Asks good questions about methodology and judgment. Shares interesting findings with the team.	Trains new analysts on Risk tools and procedures. Peer-reviews risk assessments and detection rules. Their analytical judgment is sought by other team members.	Mentors analysts across Risk domains. Leads cross-functional risk initiatives. Their risk assessments shape how Engineering and business owners prioritize remediation.	Develops the analytical capability of the entire Risk team. Sets the quality bar for risk assessment, threat intelligence, and detection engineering. Influences organizational risk culture.
Compliance and Regulatory Literacy	Knows which regulatory frameworks apply and can describe how Risk assessments support compliance.	Understands the specific regulatory requirements that govern their Risk domain. Produces risk assessments that meet the evidence standards of the relevant frameworks.	Anticipates how regulatory changes will affect the Risk program’s scope and cadence. Advises Governance on the risk implications of compliance findings.	Contributes to the organization’s regulatory strategy from a risk perspective. Engages with regulators on risk methodology.
Continuous Learning	Completes assigned training. Pursues foundational certifications. Learns the organization’s threat landscape.	Maintains current certifications. Tracks the threat actors, TTPs, and vulnerabilities relevant to the organization’s industry.	Pursues advanced certifications. Contributes threat research or methodology improvements adopted by the team. Represents the organization in threat-sharing communities.	Recognized externally for risk or threat expertise. Contributes to industry threat intelligence, risk methodology, or detection frameworks.

Full Reference: See CERG-GOV-CMP-001 for the complete competency model, including the Management Track addendum (§7) and guidance on using the model for hiring, development, and promotion (§8).

10. Success Profile

An Identity Risk Analyst is successful when identity-related risk is visible, measurable, and actively managed. Key indicators: the identity risk register captures access-related findings from across the organization; user access risk scoring identifies anomalous behavior before it becomes an incident; access certification results are analyzed for risk patterns, not just checked off; SOD violations are identified and remediated before they cause audit findings. The analyst connects identity events to business risk in terms leadership understands.

11. Career Path

11.1 Within-Family Progression

Within JF-RISKOPS, progression follows the Risk Operations level ladder in JF-001 §9.2: L1 Associate Analyst/S1, L2 Analyst/S2, L3 Senior or Lead Analyst/S3, and L4 Principal Analyst/S4. Promotion evidence should show increasing ownership of risk workflows, stronger analytical judgment, documented influence on remediation or risk acceptance decisions, cross-pillar collaboration with Engineering and Governance, and mentoring of less experienced analysts. The grade definitions and progression dimensions are maintained in JA-001 §4.

11.2 Cross-Family Movement

Cross-family movement options are defined in the Family-to-Family Career Lattice (JF-001 §4). The Left-Right Knowledge Model (FRM-001 §9.2) and cross-training expectations (OM-001 §10.4) operationalize cross-family career movement.

11.3 Management Track Option

At L3+ (SME track), a Management track option may be available per CERG-GOV-JA-001 §8.1 (SME to Management Transition). Readiness indicators include: consistently sought out for guidance by junior team members, leading cross-functional initiatives without formal authority, and communicating clearly with non-technical stakeholders. The transition is a track change, not a grade promotion — an S3 Advisor moving to M1 Manager carries their technical credibility into the management role. Management competencies are defined in CERG-GOV-CMP-001 §7. See CERG-GOV-JA-001 §5 for Management grade definitions (M1-M4) and §9 (Span of Control and Team Design) for when to create a management role.

Document	ID	Relevance
Operating Model	`CERG-GOV-OM-001`	Canonical role name; pillar structure
RACI Instrument	`CERG-GOV-RAC-001`	This role’s accountability assignments
Job Architecture	`CERG-GOV-JA-001`	Grade definitions; progression criteria
Competency Model	`CERG-GOV-CMP-001`	Full behavioral anchors
Performance Framework	`CERG-GOV-PERF-001`	Performance review cadence and calibration
Training Framework	`CERG-GOV-TRN-001`	Certification matrix
Job Families Overview	`CERG-GOV-JF-001`	Family structure and level definitions
NICE Crosswalk	`CERG-GOV-JF-002`	NICE Work Role mapping

13. Document Control

Field	Value
Document ID	CERG-GOV-JD-RISKOPS-006
Version	1.0
Status	Approved
Effective Date	2026-06-11
Classification	Public
Owner	Risk Pillar Leader
Approved By	CISO
Parent Policy	`CERG-POL-001` - Cybersecurity Policy
Review Cycle	Annual
Next Scheduled Review	2027-06-11
Frameworks	NIST SP 800-181r1 (NICE)
Regulations	Cross-cutting
Environments	All CERG-managed workforce

Revision History

Version	Date	Author	Change Summary
1.0	2026-06-11	Governance Pillar Leader	Initial release. Extracted from monolithic JD-001 into enhanced per-role format with NICE mapping, KPI sections, and competency anchor sections.

Review Triggers

Change to this role’s definition in CERG-GOV-OM-001 §6.1
Change to this role’s NICE Work Role mapping in JF-002
Change to this role’s grade range in CERG-GOV-JA-001 §7
Direction from the CISO

Governance owns this document. The Governance Pillar Leader (Policy & Standards) is responsible for initiating reviews, managing the revision cycle, and obtaining approval for all changes.

Document	ID	Relationship
Cybersecurity Policy	`CERG-POL-001`	Parent policy
Job Families Overview	`CERG-GOV-JF-001`	Family structure and level definitions
NICE Crosswalk	`CERG-GOV-JF-002`	NICE Work Role mapping

Source: roles/jf-riskops/CERG-GOV-JD-RISKOPS-006_Identity_Risk_Analyst.md · Download .md · View on GitHub